http://robubu.com/?p=26 the weblog of Rob Yates Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:34:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://robubu.com/?p=26&cpage=1#comment-90884 Досуг в москве шлюхи Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:37:22 +0000 http://robubu.com/?p=26#comment-90884 Здравствуйте, клевый блог. а как ва идея на счет его монетизации через сапу? Здравствуйте, клевый блог. а как ва идея на счет его монетизации через сапу?

]]> http://robubu.com/?p=26&cpage=1#comment-5740 James Snell Wed, 21 Mar 2007 05:43:50 +0000 http://robubu.com/?p=26#comment-5740 Relax. It's really not that bad - http://www.snellspace.com/wp/?p=625 Relax. It’s really not that bad – http://www.snellspace.com/wp/?p=625

]]> http://robubu.com/?p=26&cpage=1#comment-5735 Elias Torres » Blog Archive » Is AtomPP for or not for blogs? Wed, 21 Mar 2007 04:06:29 +0000 http://robubu.com/?p=26#comment-5735 [...] Is AtomPP for or not for blogs? Rob Yates is bringing up a serious point on the work of the Atompub WG: The Atom Publishing Protocols flexibility is its real strength, but it seems like an omission if the working group declares victory without producing an additional specification / guide that actually allows blogging clients to be interoperable with blogging servers. Wasn’t that the point? [...] [...] Is AtomPP for or not for blogs? Rob Yates is bringing up a serious point on the work of the Atompub WG: The Atom Publishing Protocols flexibility is its real strength, but it seems like an omission if the working group declares victory without producing an additional specification / guide that actually allows blogging clients to be interoperable with blogging servers. Wasn’t that the point? [...]

]]> http://robubu.com/?p=26&cpage=1#comment-5732 Chet Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:07:38 +0000 http://robubu.com/?p=26#comment-5732 Isn't this almost -embarrassing-? Protocols are APis. Heck, they're -more- than APIs. Who would use POSIX without knowing the -semantics- -- the effects -- of each POSIX "utterance"? Isn’t this almost -embarrassing-? Protocols are APis. Heck, they’re -more- than APIs. Who would use POSIX without knowing the -semantics- — the effects — of each POSIX “utterance”?

]]>